Redress, a Hong Kong based environmental charity, seek for a redesign of its LEARN platform with the aim of provide both fashion designers and educators resources in circular fashion in an accessible, user-friendly and understandable way under the framework of Squarespace.
Therefore, our team help to conduct UX audit on their LEARN platform (Designer Space with learning materials; Educator Space with teaching materials - educator packs).
Though having few initial pain-points identified, we want validated insights from targeted audience. Hence, we invited 5 designers and 6 educators to join our usability test and interview sessions.
The task was to have them show us their browsing journey and habit on the platform which enable us to:
With all the insights collected from our interviews, we organised them using affinity map which emphasise the major pain points of the LEARN platform. Here are four of the pain points that are frequently raised out by the interviewees:
1
Users potentially or unconsciously skip the youtube section
2
Users are unaware of the materials at “Other Sustainability Topics” when putting the section after “4 Core Design Strategies”
3
Users are reluctant to register and provide personal information without fully understand the content of educator packs and events
4
Users who understand bilingual are unaware of the available materials in alternative languages (French and Russian)
We summarise the insights about the needs and frustration of fashion designers and educators with use of personas, user journey map and Jobs-to-be-done framework. This helps to present users' situation to the client easily. The major insights we learnt about fashion designers and educators are:
Fashion designers wants to get design learning materials because they can learn about other's design inspirations and techniques but the website is confusing to navigate.
Educator wants to to get teaching materials because I can share the up-to-date knowledge of sustainable fashion topics with students but the website is hard to source relevant topics
Before creating our first minimum viable product, we want to illustrate and propose a new site architecture under which a user journey of completing a specific task. From there we can reorganise the content more easily in a way that make sense to the users.
Based on the insight collected from our usability test, and the proposed structure of LEARN platform, we came up with our first version of minimum viable products.
Users potentially or unconsciously skip the youtube section
1
Target: Grouping existing “Other Sustainability Topics” section with existing learning materials into a new section called “Resources”
2
Target: Including a brief introduction of educator packs and events that attract registration from educators
3
Target: Highlighting the availability of materials in alternative languages (French and Russian)
4
Having a chance to redesign a comprehensive and holistic website made me learnt a lot.
Here are some of the takeaways from this projects:
Make use of CSS effects. This helps to showcase a simple and easily understood infographic incorporated complexed concept.
Bring value by usability test. Users’ feedback are the most valuable information that inspire our design as they are the fundamental user of the website.
Involve web development input. This helps to make sure that our proposals are feasible as knowing the technical limitations in advance lessen chance of reworking.
Communication with clients. Communicating the findings of research help the client better understand the rationale behind our design.
We are glad that the client likes our designs, and decided to offer us paid internships to implement the project. Getting to work with web development was also a precious and great learning experience for us to get to know the development process of a website.